Forthcoming, "Domination and Efficiency in the Socialist Republic: A Reply to O'Shea," Political Theory
A brief reply where I raise questions for those who would marry the cause of non-domination to public ownership of the means of production. The general lesson: Caring about non-domination implies caring about efficiency.
Forthcoming, "The Social Bases of Freedom," Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
In this paper, I argue that perhaps republican theorists of freedom ought to consider freedom as not a negative property like non-domination, but a positive property in the form of a status. Once we see freedom as a status, I suggest this leads us to the idea that freedom has social bases: What makes us free are various features of social life that give us good reasons to see ourselves as free.
Forthcoming. "The Ethics of Noncompete Clauses." Business Ethics Quarterly
Recently, noncompete clauses, or clauses in contracts that limit an employee's ability to work after leaving a company, have come under critical scrutiny in both the public discourse and philosophical literature (most notably by Elizabeth Anderson). This paper asks if anything can be said in favor of noncompete clauses that takes seriously employee interests. I argue yes - noncompete clauses can act as a commitment device under the right circumstances.
2018. "Freedom without Law." Politics, Philosophy & Economics 17(3): 298-316
This paper considers the claim that there is no freedom without law. I suggest that the most plausible arguments in favor of the no freedom without law thesis also apply to another social form - social norms. Appreciating this shows how even the strongest defenders of the no freedom without law thesis have reason to be wary of the state in securing our freedom.
2017. "Incentives, Offers, and Community." Economics and Philosophy 33(3): 367-390
A common justification offered for unequal pay is that it encourages socially beneficial productivity. I defend the incentives argument against a famous criticism by G. A. Cohen by turning his (in)famous camping trip example against him.
2017. "Democratic Authority and Respect for Law" with George Klosko. Law and Philosophy 36(1): 1-23
This paper (co-authored with George Klosko) argues that recent attempts to ground authority in democracy fail. At best, we argue, democracy gives us reasons to respect the law, but not reasons to obey the law.
2016. "The Relation of Envy to Distributive Justice." Social Theory and Practice 42(3): 501-524
I advance two related claims in this paper. The first claim is that envy is a vice that has no place in the construction of ideals of justice. The second claim is that, although vices play no role in constructing justice, vices, such as envy, perhaps have a motivational role to play in facing injustice.
2015. "Putting Incentives in Context: A Reply to Penny." Res Publica 21(1): 93-98
A short response paper arguing against the claim the inequality-creating incentives endanger the self-respect of the least advantaged. I argue that what matters for self-respect is not what others have, but that we have enough.
A brief reply where I raise questions for those who would marry the cause of non-domination to public ownership of the means of production. The general lesson: Caring about non-domination implies caring about efficiency.
Forthcoming, "The Social Bases of Freedom," Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
In this paper, I argue that perhaps republican theorists of freedom ought to consider freedom as not a negative property like non-domination, but a positive property in the form of a status. Once we see freedom as a status, I suggest this leads us to the idea that freedom has social bases: What makes us free are various features of social life that give us good reasons to see ourselves as free.
Forthcoming. "The Ethics of Noncompete Clauses." Business Ethics Quarterly
Recently, noncompete clauses, or clauses in contracts that limit an employee's ability to work after leaving a company, have come under critical scrutiny in both the public discourse and philosophical literature (most notably by Elizabeth Anderson). This paper asks if anything can be said in favor of noncompete clauses that takes seriously employee interests. I argue yes - noncompete clauses can act as a commitment device under the right circumstances.
2018. "Freedom without Law." Politics, Philosophy & Economics 17(3): 298-316
This paper considers the claim that there is no freedom without law. I suggest that the most plausible arguments in favor of the no freedom without law thesis also apply to another social form - social norms. Appreciating this shows how even the strongest defenders of the no freedom without law thesis have reason to be wary of the state in securing our freedom.
2017. "Incentives, Offers, and Community." Economics and Philosophy 33(3): 367-390
A common justification offered for unequal pay is that it encourages socially beneficial productivity. I defend the incentives argument against a famous criticism by G. A. Cohen by turning his (in)famous camping trip example against him.
2017. "Democratic Authority and Respect for Law" with George Klosko. Law and Philosophy 36(1): 1-23
This paper (co-authored with George Klosko) argues that recent attempts to ground authority in democracy fail. At best, we argue, democracy gives us reasons to respect the law, but not reasons to obey the law.
2016. "The Relation of Envy to Distributive Justice." Social Theory and Practice 42(3): 501-524
I advance two related claims in this paper. The first claim is that envy is a vice that has no place in the construction of ideals of justice. The second claim is that, although vices play no role in constructing justice, vices, such as envy, perhaps have a motivational role to play in facing injustice.
2015. "Putting Incentives in Context: A Reply to Penny." Res Publica 21(1): 93-98
A short response paper arguing against the claim the inequality-creating incentives endanger the self-respect of the least advantaged. I argue that what matters for self-respect is not what others have, but that we have enough.